Is public school free and affordable any longer? I’ve been in the parenting game a long
while, my oldest being 25 years of age. As such, I’ve seen plenty of changes in the public
school system, least here in California.
One of the biggest changes I’ve seen is how it’s impossible for a
student, who is excelling and wants to be on tract to go to a good four-year
university, to get the promised free education public school claims is a
possibility.
My youngest son, who will be a junior in high school next
year, is a member of the IB, International Bachelorette program, at his local
high school. So what does this
mean, the IB program is an accelerated program that allows advanced kids to be
challenged and also proves to prospective universities that the student is not
only serious about attending their institution, but is qualified to handle the
work load, as they’ve had to do similar while in high school. But there’s a problem….
In order for these students to prove that they’re super
serious about attending a four-year university and are capable of putting in
the dedication to fulfill all educational
requirements, they’re unable to pull that off without having to attend summer
school. That’s where my question
comes in.
In order for these students to get the classes they need to
complete the IB program, they must take advanced courses not offered through
the free regular summer school program.
As such, we, as the parents, are gouged with high priced classes. Now I ask, is this fair?
To me, this type of so-called free public school education
is anything but. And I have the
payment receipts to prove such. In
addition, it gives me that squeamish feeling I get when I realize that a
program has become elitist, meaning that only those who can literally pay an
above-and-beyond price ticket are entitled to participate.
Yes, I’m aware this is the sad truth of the world. But when it comes to the education of
our children—the future makers, shakers, artists and creators of our future, I
don’t agree with this being a mode of operation. Something has gone terribly amuck when children are no
longer able to get the education they deserve…unless they can pay for it…and
that’s with so-called free education.
Don’t even get me going on the pitfalls of private education. Been there and done that with my oldest
child a lifetime ago.
So back to my original question…. Is public school free and
affordable any longer? The answer
is a resounding no! What a sad
state of affairs this is. How tragic
for current students. For those
who haven’t even begun school yet….
What will education be for them?
How will those future children be guaranteed quality education? Unless they can pay for it…. It would appear, at least in
California, that lawmakers—the majority of whose children do not attend public school systems—care
little if at all about how current and future children will become
educated. If they will be educated.
Perhaps those same lawmakers should rethink this cause, as it is those
very current and future children who will hold the lawmakers’ futures in their
hands as they age….
A "general education" is free, but given the advanced nature of your son's studies, it's likely not a prerequisite of the school to provide this level of education. Add to that, this is probably not a requirement. Add to that the issue that your beautiful state of California is in a rather frightening death spiral from a financial standpoint and there you have it: a combination worthy of your cash.
ReplyDeleteYou have to pay for EVERYTHING beyond basic schooling where I am.
ReplyDeleteHey Eli O.,
ReplyDeleteYou summed it all up perfectly...sadly...but a perfect summation....
Hey Tracy,
ReplyDeleteYup, that's the way it's become here as well. And by basic, I mean the lowest denominator of requirements. Nothing extra. Nothing that would encourage any student's innate abilities. Nope, what CA lawmakers want is for each and every student to be a carbon copy of the next with a minimalistic education. So sad....